Project measure / variable:   Gould2   FC_immediate_acu_0

ID, description, units MPD:47131   FC_immediate_acu_0   acute group, percent immobility in training chamber after first stimulus pairing   [%]  dose control mg  
nicotine study
Data set, strains Gould2   inbred   8 strains     sex: m     age:
Procedure fear conditioning test
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Gould2 - acute group, percent immobility in training chamber after first stimulus pairing dose control mg



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary Male
Number of strains tested8 strains
Mean of the strain means13.8   %
Median of the strain means9.29   %
SD of the strain means± 15.1
Coefficient of variation (CV)1.09
Min–max range of strain means0.692   –   41.0   %
Mean sample size per strain12.4   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
strain 7 19452.994 2778.9991 40.9043 < 0.0001
Residuals 91 6182.4577 67.9391


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S6/SvEvTac m 29.2 12.6   12 3.63 0.431 8.3, 41.7 1.02
A/J m 15.1 9.74   11 2.94 0.643 0.09
BALB/cByJ m 0.692 2.4   12 0.692 3.46 -0.87
C3H/HeJ m 3.47 7.5   12 2.16 2.16 -0.68
C57BL/6J m 1.79 4.83   14 1.29 2.7 -0.8
CBA/J m 0.692 2.4   12 0.692 3.46 -0.87
DBA/1J m 18.4 12.7   14 3.4 0.69 0.31
DBA/2J m 41.0 5.59   12 1.61 0.136 33.3, 50.0 1.8


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S6/SvEvTac m 29.1833 2.3794 33.9097 24.4569
A/J m 15.1455 2.4852 20.082 10.2089
BALB/cByJ m 0.6917 2.3794 5.4181 0.0
C3H/HeJ m 3.4667 2.3794 8.1931 0.0
C57BL/6J m 1.7857 2.2029 6.1615 0.0
CBA/J m 0.6917 2.3794 5.4181 0.0
DBA/1J m 18.45 2.2029 22.8258 14.0742
DBA/2J m 40.9833 2.3794 45.7097 36.2569




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS