An error occurred on this page.
These results could be incomplete or invalid. Staff have been notified.



Project measure / variable:   Petkova1   LYM_M24

ID, description, units MPD:24209   LYM_M24   lymphocyte differential (LYM; percentage of total WBC)   [%]  at age 24mo  
Data set, strains Petkova1   inbred   12 strains     sex: both     age: 104wks
Procedure immune cell quantification
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Petkova1 - lymphocyte differential (LYM; percentage of total WBC) at age 24mo



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested11 strains11 strains
Mean of the strain means39.7   % 35.0   %
Median of the strain means38.7   % 36.6   %
SD of the strain means± 9.37 ± 9.18
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.236 0.262
Min–max range of strain means20.3   –   51.4   % 18.4   –   50.6   %
Mean sample size per strain7.0   mice 7.1   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 664.7035 664.7035 4.6719 0.0326
strain 9 10095.7541 1121.7505 7.8843 < 0.0001
sex:strain 9 816.0915 90.6768 0.6373 0.7632
Residuals 121 17215.3514 142.2756


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f 42.1 4.38   6 1.79 0.104 33.4, 45.2 0.26
129S1/SvImJ m 30.5 12.0   7 4.53 0.393 11.0, 49.7 -0.49
BALB/cByJ f 29.3 13.7   7 5.17 0.467 4.59, 47.9 -1.11
C3H/HeJ m 25.1 9.85   8 3.48 0.393 10.4, 40.2 -1.08
C57BL/10J f 51.4 19.7   8 6.98 0.384 14.7, 77.0 1.25
C57BL/10J m 41.4 15.7   6 6.39 0.378 19.7, 59.6 0.7
C57BL/6J f 37.1 11.7   8 4.13 0.315 19.8, 49.6 -0.28
C57BL/6J m 30.6 7.92   8 2.8 0.259 16.2, 37.7 -0.48
C57BLKS/J f 49.4 6.7   6 2.73 0.136 42.2, 58.0 1.04
C57BLKS/J m 40.6 7.65   7 2.89 0.188 24.5, 48.4 0.61
C57BR/cdJ f 38.4 16.9   7 6.4 0.441 11.5, 65.6 -0.14
C57BR/cdJ m 43.3 7.65   9 2.55 0.177 32.0, 55.6 0.91
LP/J f 41.7 15.9   8 5.64 0.382 6.88, 57.8 0.22
LP/J m 38.2 5.71   6 2.33 0.15 30.6, 45.4 0.35
NON/ShiLtJ f 20.3 6.02   8 2.13 0.297 13.2, 28.2 -2.07
NON/ShiLtJ m 18.4 7.04   7 2.66 0.382 12.3, 29.9 -1.81
NZW/LacJ f 51.3 9.16   6 3.74 0.178 37.1, 61.6 1.24
NZW/LacJ m 50.6 16.5   7 6.23 0.326 27.0, 72.8 1.7
PWD/PhJ f 38.7 13.5   7 5.11 0.35 9.92, 52.8 -0.1
PWD/PhJ m 36.6 14.2   7 5.36 0.388 11.9, 54.7 0.18
WSB/EiJ f 36.8 13.8   6 5.62 0.374 15.8, 52.0 -0.31
WSB/EiJ m 29.4 7.68   7 2.9 0.261 20.4, 39.6 -0.61


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f 42.1167 4.8696 51.7572 32.4761
129S1/SvImJ m 30.4571 4.5083 39.3826 21.5317
C57BL/10J f 51.45 4.2172 59.799 43.101
C57BL/10J m 41.4333 4.8696 51.0739 31.7928
C57BL/6J f 37.1375 4.2172 45.4865 28.7885
C57BL/6J m 30.6 4.2172 38.949 22.251
C57BLKS/J f 49.4167 4.8696 59.0572 39.7761
C57BLKS/J m 40.6143 4.5083 49.5397 31.6888
C57BR/cdJ f 38.3857 4.5083 47.3112 29.4603
C57BR/cdJ m 43.2667 3.976 51.1382 35.3952
LP/J f 41.7475 4.2172 50.0965 33.3985
LP/J m 38.1833 4.8696 47.8239 28.5428
NON/ShiLtJ f 20.3 4.2172 28.649 11.951
NON/ShiLtJ m 18.4143 4.5083 27.3397 9.4888
NZW/LacJ f 51.3333 4.8696 60.9739 41.6928
NZW/LacJ m 50.6429 4.5083 59.5683 41.7174
PWD/PhJ f 38.6743 4.5083 47.5997 29.7488
PWD/PhJ m 36.5857 4.5083 45.5112 27.6603
WSB/EiJ f 36.8 4.8696 46.4406 27.1594
WSB/EiJ m 29.3714 4.5083 38.2969 20.446


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ both 36.2869 3.318 42.8559 29.718
C57BL/10J both 46.4417 3.2209 52.8183 40.065
C57BL/6J both 33.8688 2.982 39.7724 27.9651
C57BLKS/J both 45.0155 3.318 51.5844 38.4465
C57BR/cdJ both 40.8262 3.0056 46.7765 34.8759
LP/J both 39.9654 3.2209 46.3421 33.5888
NON/ShiLtJ both 19.3571 3.0866 25.468 13.2463
NZW/LacJ both 50.9881 3.318 57.557 44.4191
PWD/PhJ both 37.63 3.1879 43.9412 31.3188
WSB/EiJ both 33.0857 3.318 39.6547 26.5168




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS