Project measure / variable:   Taft1   pct_live_fresh

ID, description, units MPD:19321   pct_live_fresh   live pups, percentage of fresh ET   [%]  
Data set, strains Taft1   inbred   10 strains     sex: f
Procedure assisted reproduction
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Taft1 - live pups, percentage of fresh ET



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary Female
Number of strains tested10 strains
Mean of the strain means34.9   %
Median of the strain means34.8   %
SD of the strain means± 14.4
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.414
Min–max range of strain means5.00   –   53.1   %
Mean sample size per strain13.8   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
strain 9 26208.1218 2912.0135 6.6273 < 0.0001
Residuals 125 54924.8948 439.3992


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f 41.5 32.7   13 9.06 0.788 0.46
A/J f 5.0 7.6   14 2.03 1.52 -2.07
BALB/cByJ f 25.6 14.4   16 3.61 0.565 -0.64
BALB/cJ f 31.4 24.0   10 7.58 0.762 -0.24
C3H/HeJ f 36.2 16.8   12 4.85 0.465 0.09
C57BL/6J f 53.1 22.1   15 5.7 0.416 1.26
DBA/2J f 24.7 19.6   15 5.06 0.794 -0.71
FVB/NJ f 33.4 20.9   16 5.22 0.627 -0.1
NOD/ShiLtJ f 50.2 22.5   15 5.8 0.447 1.06
SJL/J f 47.9 22.8   9 7.6 0.476 20.0, 85.7 0.9


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f 41.4769 5.8138 52.9831 29.9707
A/J f 5.0 5.6023 16.0876 0.0
BALB/cByJ f 25.5562 5.2405 35.9278 15.1847
BALB/cJ f 31.43 6.6287 44.5491 18.3109
C3H/HeJ f 36.1917 6.0512 48.1677 24.2157
C57BL/6J f 53.1133 5.4123 63.825 42.4017
DBA/2J f 24.6667 5.4123 35.3783 13.955
FVB/NJ f 33.35 5.2405 43.7215 22.9785
NOD/ShiLtJ f 50.2267 5.4123 60.9383 39.515
SJL/J f 47.8556 6.9873 61.6843 34.0269




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS