Project measure / variable:   Auwerx2   fat_pct_CD

ID, description, units MPD:114565   fat_pct_CD   percentage fat tissue mass   [%]  CD  
Data set, strains Auwerx2   inbred w/CC8   9 strains     sex: both     age: 14wks
Procedure MRI
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

Auwerx2 - percentage fat tissue mass CD



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested9 strains9 strains
Mean of the strain means16.791   % 18.928   %
Median of the strain means15.241   % 14.779   %
SD of the strain means± 11.008 ± 9.2153
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.6555 0.4869
Min–max range of strain means6.8574   –   43.071   % 9.0326   –   36.476   %
Mean sample size per strain4.0   mice 4.8   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 38.4928 38.4928 2.9665 0.0902
strain 7 6068.6636 866.9519 66.8134 < 0.0001
sex:strain 7 598.1342 85.4477 6.5852 < 0.0001
Residuals 59 765.5672 12.9757


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f 15.617 4.3884   5 1.9625 0.281 12.65, 23.169 -0.11
129S1/SvImJ m 14.779 5.6746   5 2.5377 0.384 9.4745, 23.913 -0.45
A/J f 23.525 2.4981   5 1.1172 0.1062 19.582, 26.184 0.61
A/J m 21.799 1.7329   5 0.77497 0.0795 19.645, 24.101 0.31
C57BL/6J f 9.5885 1.8789   5 0.84027 0.196 7.2027, 11.712 -0.65
C57BL/6J m 11.821 2.6487   5 1.1845 0.2241 9.2769, 15.643 -0.77
CAST/EiJ f 6.8574 0.0   1   0.0 0.0 6.8574, 6.8574 -0.9
CAST/EiJ m 13.457 3.3663   3 1.9435 0.2502 9.5773, 15.603 -0.59
DBA/2J f 15.241 2.7795   5 1.2431 0.1824 11.024, 18.733 -0.14
DBA/2J m 22.912 5.896   5 2.6368 0.2573 16.457, 32.264 0.43
NOD/ShiLtJ f 10.218 0.82415   3 0.47582 0.0807 9.6083, 11.156 -0.6
NOD/ShiLtJ m 9.0326 1.9999   5 0.89439 0.2214 6.9374, 11.765 -1.07
NZO/HlLtJ f 43.071 2.2668   4 1.1334 0.0526 41.145, 45.977 2.39
NZO/HlLtJ m 36.476 3.5508   5 1.588 0.0973 32.067, 41.706 1.9
PWK/PhJ f 16.166 5.9033   5 2.6401 0.3652 9.1716, 25.554 -0.06
PWK/PhJ m 28.677 3.2606   5 1.4582 0.1137 24.289, 33.161 1.06
WSB/EiJ f 10.839 3.8482   3 2.2218 0.355 6.4923, 13.811 -0.54
WSB/EiJ m 11.397 1.9923   5 0.89096 0.1748 9.0199, 13.753 -0.82


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f 15.6174 1.6109447514 18.8408930019 12.3939069981
129S1/SvImJ m 14.7787 1.6109447514 18.0021930019 11.5552069981
A/J f 23.5248 1.6109447514 26.7482930019 20.3013069981
A/J m 21.7992 1.6109447514 25.0226930019 18.5757069981
C57BL/6J f 9.58854 1.6109447514 12.8120330019 6.3650469981
C57BL/6J m 11.82116 1.6109447514 15.0446530019 8.5976669981
DBA/2J f 15.2408 1.6109447514 18.4642930019 12.0173069981
DBA/2J m 22.9118 1.6109447514 26.1352930019 19.6883069981
NOD/ShiLtJ f 10.2184666667 2.0797207313 14.3799782376 6.0569550957
NOD/ShiLtJ m 9.03256 1.6109447514 12.2560530019 5.8090669981
NZO/HlLtJ f 43.071 1.801090986 46.6749747386 39.4670252614
NZO/HlLtJ m 36.4758 1.6109447514 39.6992930019 33.2523069981
PWK/PhJ f 16.16592 1.6109447514 19.3894130019 12.9424269981
PWK/PhJ m 28.6766 1.6109447514 31.9000930019 25.4531069981
WSB/EiJ f 10.8391 2.0797207313 15.0006115709 6.6775884291
WSB/EiJ m 11.39658 1.6109447514 14.6200730019 8.1730869981


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ both 15.19805 1.1391099578 17.4774037607 12.9186962393
A/J both 22.662 1.1391099578 24.9413537607 20.3826462393
C57BL/6J both 10.70485 1.1391099578 12.9842037607 8.4254962393
DBA/2J both 19.0763 1.1391099578 21.3556537607 16.7969462393
NOD/ShiLtJ both 9.6255133333 1.3153308816 12.257484348 6.9935423187
NZO/HlLtJ both 39.7734 1.2082085635 42.1910197514 37.3557802486
PWK/PhJ both 22.42126 1.1391099578 24.7006137607 20.1419062393
WSB/EiJ both 11.11784 1.3153308816 13.7498110147 8.4858689853




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS