Project measure / variable:   CSNA03   diff_trials_rev_acq_in_Binghamton

ID, description, units MPD:113852   diff_trials_rev_acq_in_Binghamton   reversal trials minus acquisition trials (reversal learning assay), founders   [n]  
Data set, strains CSNA03   inbred w/CC8   8 strains     sex: both     age:
Procedure operant conditioning chamber
Ontology mappings

  •   Or, add this measure to your collection.
       
  •     no folder
  •     put it in new folder  

  STRAIN COMPARISON PLOT
Dimensions Width:   px    Height:   px
Download Plot   
Visualization Options

CSNA03 - reversal trials minus acquisition trials (reversal learning assay), founders



  MEASURE SUMMARY
Measure Summary FemaleMale
Number of strains tested8 strains8 strains
Mean of the strain means28.508   n 23.906   n
Median of the strain means32.284   n 21.334   n
SD of the strain means± 28.216 ± 24.548
Coefficient of variation (CV)0.9898 1.0269
Min–max range of strain means-10.429   –   62.5   n -18.8   –   53.25   n
Mean sample size per strain6.0   mice 4.9   mice


  ANOVA, Q-Q NORMALITY ASSESSMENT
ANOVA summary      
FactorDFSum of squaresMean sum of squaresF valuep value (Pr>F)
sex 1 293.6022 293.6022 0.0467 0.8295
strain 7 21862.3919 3123.1988 0.497 0.8337
sex:strain 7 32919.1779 4702.7397 0.7483 0.632
Residuals 71 446199.6786 6284.5025


Q-Q normality assessment based on residuals

  


  STRAIN MEANS (UNADJUSTED)
  
Select table page:
Strain Sex Mean SD N mice SEM CV Min, Max Z score
129S1/SvImJ f 50.0 54.82   7 20.72 1.0964 -45.0, 114.0 0.76
129S1/SvImJ m 44.4 47.616   5 21.295 1.0724 1.0, 111.0 0.83
A/J f 62.5 58.8   6 24.004 0.9408 -29.0, 146.0 1.2
A/J m 4.4 59.93   5 26.8 13.6199 -63.0, 68.0 -0.79
C57BL/6J f 42.4 34.085   5 15.243 0.8039 -1.0, 79.0 0.49
C57BL/6J m 48.833 31.48   6 12.852 0.6446 2.0, 90.0 1.02
CAST/EiJ f -10.429 99.35   7 37.551 -9.5268 -104.0, 157.0 -1.38
CAST/EiJ m 26.0 46.526   4 23.263 1.7895 -5.0, 95.0 0.09
NOD/ShiLtJ f 56.8 148.8   5 66.56 2.6205 -123.0, 261.0 1.0
NOD/ShiLtJ m -18.8 119.6   5 53.47 -6.3597 -164.0, 106.0 -1.74
NZO/HlLtJ f 6.4286 45.177   7 17.075 7.0275 -50.0, 75.0 -0.78
NZO/HlLtJ m 53.25 36.918   4 18.459 0.6933 19.0, 101.0 1.2
PWK/PhJ f 22.167 148.1   6 60.46 6.6815 -199.0, 244.0 -0.22
PWK/PhJ m 16.667 56.37   6 23.011 3.3819 -83.0, 83.0 -0.29
WSB/EiJ f -1.8 70.36   5 31.466 -39.0896 -102.0, 55.0 -1.07
WSB/EiJ m 16.5 39.281   4 19.641 2.3807 -28.0, 62.0 -0.3


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED)
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ f 50.0 29.9630785065 109.7446816682 -9.7446816682
129S1/SvImJ m 44.4 35.4527925983 115.090860673 -26.290860673
A/J f 62.5 32.3638237211 127.0316316668 -2.0316316668
A/J m 4.4 35.4527925983 75.090860673 -66.290860673
C57BL/6J f 42.4 35.4527925983 113.090860673 -28.290860673
C57BL/6J m 48.8333333333 32.3638237211 113.3649650001 -15.6982983334
CAST/EiJ f -10.4285714286 29.9630785065 49.3161102396 -70.1732530968
CAST/EiJ m 26.0 39.637427121 105.0347849264 -53.0347849264
NOD/ShiLtJ f 56.8 35.4527925983 127.490860673 -13.890860673
NOD/ShiLtJ m -18.8 35.4527925983 51.890860673 -89.490860673
NZO/HlLtJ f 6.4285714286 29.9630785065 66.1732530968 -53.3161102396
NZO/HlLtJ m 53.25 39.637427121 132.2847849264 -25.7847849264
PWK/PhJ f 22.1666666667 32.3638237211 86.6982983334 -42.3649650001
PWK/PhJ m 16.6666666667 32.3638237211 81.1982983334 -47.8649650001
WSB/EiJ f -1.8 35.4527925983 68.890860673 -72.490860673
WSB/EiJ m 16.5 39.637427121 95.5347849264 -62.5347849264


  LEAST SQUARES MEANS (MODEL-ADJUSTED), SEXES COMBINED
Strain Sex Mean SEM UpperCL LowerCL
129S1/SvImJ both 47.2 23.2093008113 93.4780314251 0.9219685749
A/J both 33.45 24.0016540517 81.3079389137 -14.4079389137
C57BL/6J both 45.6166666667 24.0016540517 93.4746055803 -2.241272247
CAST/EiJ both 7.7857142857 24.8440722425 57.3233873639 -41.7519587924
NOD/ShiLtJ both 19.0 25.0689100583 68.9859869498 -30.9859869498
NZO/HlLtJ both 29.8392857143 24.8440722425 79.3769587924 -19.6983873639
PWK/PhJ both 19.4166666667 22.8846792183 65.0474210193 -26.2140876859
WSB/EiJ both 7.35 26.5895944487 60.3681455047 -45.6681455047




  GWAS USING LINEAR MIXED MODELS