Intervention: resveratrol dietary supplement | ||||
Res_lo effect on survival, females, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.644 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.4796 |
Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
769 | 772 | |
|
906 | 882 | | |
990 | 968 | | |
1104 | 1077 | | |
1284 | 1261 | ||
143 | 237 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_hi effect on survival, females, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.4818 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0356 |
Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
776 | 772 | |
|
905 | 882 | | |
1004 | 968 | | |
1112 | 1077 | | |
1246 | 1261 | ||
143 | 237 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_lo effect on survival, males, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.9518 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.4223 |
Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
692 | 650 | |
|
830 | 826 | | |
954 | 949 | | |
1037 | 1060 | | |
1235 | 1268 | ||
159 | 309 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_hi effect on survival, males, test site = All | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.1577 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.2484 |
Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
685 | 650 | |
|
882 | 826 | | |
990 | 949 | | |
1077 | 1060 | | |
1294 | 1268 | ||
154 | 309 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_lo effect on survival, females, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.9578 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.3503 |
Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
756 | 792 | |
|
925 | 888 | | |
990 | 972 | | |
1118 | 1077 | | |
1284 | 1261 | ||
47 | 68 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_hi effect on survival, females, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.6877 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0264 |
Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
795 | 792 | |
|
896 | 888 | | |
1022 | 972 | | |
1168 | 1077 | | |
1242 | 1261 | ||
48 | 68 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_lo effect on survival, males, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.5409 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.2901 |
Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
574 | 633 | |
|
749 | 800 | | |
934 | 916 | | |
1013 | 1007 | | |
1164 | 1197 | ||
58 | 96 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_hi effect on survival, males, test site = TJL | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.361 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 1.0 |
Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
615 | 633 | |
|
796 | 800 | | |
895 | 916 | | |
980 | 1007 | | |
1091 | 1197 | ||
54 | 96 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_lo effect on survival, females, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.4967 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 1.0 |
Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
692 | 788 | |
|
862 | 891 | | |
973 | 990 | | |
1094 | 1069 | | |
1166 | 1248 | ||
48 | 87 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_hi effect on survival, females, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.1637 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.0851 |
Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
772 | 788 | |
|
946 | 891 | | |
1032 | 990 | | |
1126 | 1069 | | |
1246 | 1248 | ||
48 | 87 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_lo effect on survival, males, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.8515 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.5792 |
Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
757 | 701 | |
|
882 | 851 | | |
957 | 974 | | |
1082 | 1077 | | |
1206 | 1268 | ||
49 | 107 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_hi effect on survival, males, test site = UM | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.2869 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.2362 |
Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
702 | 701 | |
|
895 | 851 | | |
993 | 974 | | |
1138 | 1077 | | |
1294 | 1268 | ||
48 | 107 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_lo effect on survival, females, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.1385 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.7623 |
Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
832 | 748 | |
|
926 | 843 | | |
1047 | 964 | | |
1110 | 1105 | | |
1199 | 1192 | ||
48 | 82 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_hi effect on survival, females, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.5236 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.7678 |
Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
775 | 748 | |
|
867 | 843 | | |
975 | 964 | | |
1031 | 1105 | | |
1167 | 1192 | ||
47 | 82 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_lo effect on survival, males, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.4978 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 1.0 |
Quantiles | Res_lo | Control | |
722 | 586 | |
|
850 | 813 | | |
958 | 935 | | |
1026 | 1053 | | |
1235 | 1212 | ||
52 | 106 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |
Res_hi effect on survival, males, test site = UT | ||
Log-rank test | p = 0.0281 | |
Wang-Allison test | p = 0.4015 |
Quantiles | Res_hi | Control | |
732 | 586 | |
|
950 | 813 | | |
1054 | 935 | | |
1093 | 1053 | | |
1201 | 1212 | ||
52 | 106 | ||
Animal censor events are denoted by + marks in the plot |